J E F F R E Y  E V A N  G O L D      
AWARD WINNING
NEW JERSEDWI LAWYER
 Call 856-424-4494 for FREE Consult !

Hearing required when state destroys evidence

In an unpublished decision issued September 14, 2011,  State v Carlson, the App Div remanded a DWI for a hearing on whether the State's routine destruction of the calibration files when downloading digital data amounted to a Brady violation. The issue was not the routine digital data which it was agreed was supplied.
 
The back story not before this court is that the State claims that a software glitch will prevent proper operation if the calibration files are not deleted and that the paper files are  all the info a def needs anyway. However, Dr Baum testified (in that other matter) that one of the things destroyed in the process is the tolerance employed, certainly a critical fact which is now routinely destroyed by the NJSP.
 
The case stands for the proposition that an evidentiary hearing must be held to determine whether the destruction amounts to a Brady violation. 

Add a Comment

(Enter the numbers shown in the above image)